Follow-up on "To GM or not to GM?"

In a previous post, I wrote about the controversy around a toxicity study of Monsanto crops. This post got a very valid comment, which I'd like to respond to here.

Paul wrote:
"de Vendomois' statistics are poor and not applicable to the Monsanto research data they used. The funding for their research was also funded in its entirity by Greenpeace. You have to ask yourself why Greenpeace/de Vendemois used the statistical approach they did knowing its flaws (as pointed out to them by the European Food Safety Authority in 2007). A cynic would suggest they conspired to use whatever method appeared to shed a negative light on GM crops. Would this collaboration have published truly independant research that showed no difference in toxicity between GM and Non-GM plants?
I'm no fan of multinational corporations profiting from our basic food needs, but the dodgy, deceitful and blindly prejudiced approaches used by NGOs such as Greenpeace as part of their scaremongering campaigns is far worse than the in-house research by companies like Monsanto as far as I can see."
This is a very good point.
One thing that made me rather uncomfortable when reading the Vendomois paper was my inability to follow the statistic acrobatics they performed. Which has prompted me to go and brush up on my statistics, but meanwhile, I can only pick up on the points that seem to be valid even without having to judge the validity of the statistics employed - the legal battle around data that was supposed to be public anyway, the fact that genetic manipulations as employed are more of a shotgun approach than anything else, and the failure of regulatory bodies to require elucidation of the (inadvertent) changes in the plants' genomes.

Generally, I'm in a bit of a troubling spot: I'm generally in favor of biotechnology, genetic manipulation, and whatnot, but also skeptical of how it is practiced today. I can stand neither the fear-mongering that Greenpeace and friends are spreading, nor the glorious promises and dubious practice of corporations like Monsanto. I'm trying to find my way in between these two extremes, which is rather difficult. Apparently, with the blog post in question, I haven't done a very good job at it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting my Pharmacia LKB Multidrive XL online... now with 3D printing!

Image
Quite a while back, I bought a used Pharmacia LKB Multidrive XL on eBay. It's a gel electrohphoresis power supply that can output up to 3500 volts at several hundred milliamps. There was a problem, though: Whenever I tried to use it, it just gave me the error "Invalid connector". The unit didn't come with a manual, so I was stumped as to what exactly this error meant. Searching for the manual online didn't yield anything besides a few old forum posts with broken links. The manufacturer, Pharmacia, had since been bought be Amersham, which in turn had been bought by GE Healthcare. It seemed like a long shot, but I rang up the GE Healthcare customer support and asked for the manual. They were amazingly helpful and sent me a PDF. Armed with the manual, I learned that the error I was getting was connected to one of the many safety precautions that were built into the device. First off, the unit has four power outlets. All four need to be plugged in with something, ...
Read more

DIYBio and biotinkering - Laws and regulations in Germany

A few days ago, I was reading a book on working with cell cultures , which includes an overview of the legal requirements for working with GMOs in a lab. This was a bit of a smack on the head for me - I had never thought of that before. With all that talk and all the recent articles hyping garage biology (often meaning garage genetic engineering), I had never come across a discussion of the legal situation. How could I have missed that? So I looked into the matter, talked to people on the DIYBio mailing list, and it turns out that opening up a biohacking space in Germany as an autodidact is somewhat tricky. The following is a summary of the legal situation in Germany (though bear in mind that I'm no legal expert). Genetic engineering is regulated through the Gentechnikgesetz (GenTG) and the Gentechniksicherheitsverordnung (GenTSV) . Any work that inserts synthetic DNA into an organism falls under this law. To do that kind of work, you have to register a lab. This lab has to...
Read more

A tale of three cities

(Disclaimer: This post is about a toilet door. Yes. You read correctly. A toilet door that has come to mean a lot of things.) Once upon a time, there was a group of people who had spent all their lives in a kingdom where women were considered commodities and things of value only if they pleased the eye. Believing that every human being should be regarded as such, they were frustrated with this, and so they decided to go out into the world and find a more accepting place. They came upon a fork in the road that led into three different directions; they decided to split up and promised to send each other word on what they found on the end of each road. Each group came upon a magnificent city at the end of its respective road, full of technology and science and art and wonder, where strangeness and new perspectives and possibilities of being seemed to be around every corner. However, those three cities were not all the same; and the respective groups soon came to experience very ...
Read more